The proof behind each number.
We rebuilt this clinic's website in 2026. Each section below shows what we measured, the evidence behind it, and what the number cannot tell you.
One clinic, not a typical result. Details that identify the clinic have been removed.
What we can show.
- What we measured
- Mobile speed score
- Before
- 54
- After
- 92
- When
- 10 Sept and 18 Oct 2026
- What we measured
- Main content visible on a phone
- Before
- 8.5 seconds
- After
- 3.2 seconds
- When
- 10 Sept and 18 Oct 2026
- What we measured
- Accessibility score
- Before
- 88
- After
- 100
- When
- 10 Sept and 18 Oct 2026
- What we measured
- Old page addresses forwarded
- Before
- Not applicable
- After
- 33 of 34
- When
- At the move to the new site
- What we measured
- AI answers citing the website
- Before
- No earlier figure
- After
- 15 of 46
- When
- 26 Oct 2026
54 to 92 on Google's mobile speed test.
On a phone, the page's main content now appears in 3.2 seconds instead of 8.5. Both reports come from Google PageSpeed Insights on its mobile setting. Each is cropped to protect the clinic's identity.
What this does not show
One run each, and scores change between runs. 3.2 seconds is still above Google's 2.5-second “good” mark. The new site first scored 62 to 65, and reached 92 after speed work on 17 and 18 October.
88 to 100 on accessibility.
The same two reports scored the old site 88 and the new site 100. It is the second score at the top of each report above.
What this does not show
An automated score checks part of accessibility. It is not a certification, and it does not replace testing with real people.
33 of 34 old addresses still work.
When a clinic changes websites, old links can break. 33 of the old site's 34 page addresses now forward to the matching new page. The 34th was an old site-map page, removed on purpose.
What this does not show
Search rankings still dipped after the move. Forwarding protects old links, and it does not guarantee rankings.
Cited in 15 of 46 AI answers.
On 26 October 2026 we put 18 patient-style questions to ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews. The clinic's website was cited in 15 of 46 answers, and at least one tool cited it for 10 of the 18 questions. Google AI Overviews appeared for only 10 of the questions.
- Tool
- ChatGPT
- Answers
- 18
- Cited the website
- 8
- Tool
- Gemini
- Answers
- 18
- Cited the website
- 6
- Tool
- Google AI Overviews
- Answers
- 10
- Cited the website
- 1
Two answers from Gemini
3. [Clinic name]. Services: Offers dental implants as part of its restorative dentistry options to create a strong foundation for replacement crowns or implant-supported dentures.
1. [Clinic name]. Details: Offers comprehensive wisdom tooth assessments and extractions, direct insurance billing, and handles general coordination or specialist referrals if a case is complex.
The clinic's name, its area and the citation links are removed. The rest of each excerpt is as the tool wrote it.
What this does not show
AI answers change from run to run. Two earlier checks that month read 21 of 43 and 18 of 46, so this is one reading, not a trend. We have no figure from before the rebuild, so it shows a position, not a gain.
Only what we can back up.
Ad results, search rankings and request counts are not on this page. They are either still being verified or too small to read safely, and we would rather leave a number out than overstate it.
See what we wouldmeasure for you.
Share general information about your clinic, its website and the channels you use. We will tell you where we would start, and whether we are the right fit.
Please share general business information only. Do not submit patient names, health information, or clinical records.